OPTIMIZING IMAGE CLASSIFICATION MODELS: A STUDY ON COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND ACCURACY

Authors

  • R. T. Amosa Department of Computer Science, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
  • A. Adebanjo Department of Computer Science, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
  • O. A. Bello Department of Physical, Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Aletheia University, Ago Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria
  • F. A. Alifat Department of Computer Science, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
  • L. M. Olatunji Department of Computer Science, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
  • O. A. Biodun Department of Computer Science, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
  • A. A. Amosa Department of Computer Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
  • O. A. Oluwatobi Department of Computer Science, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63747/jeis.v1i1.5

Keywords:

Distributed, Algorithm, Computational, Constraints, Dataset, Ensemble, Performance

Abstract

In computer vision, image classification remains a challenging and critical routine, widely applied in domains such as healthcare, security, and autonomous systems. This study evaluates the efficiency of various algorithms implemented for image classification using machine learning, including traditional models such as Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) alongside deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and ResNet. The research adopts an experimental approach using a dataset containing images of animals (cats, dogs, and pandas), processed and classified using different algorithms. Performance was assessed using F1-score, recall, accuracy and precision. The study reveal that deep learning models significantly outperform traditional machine learning techniques, with a pre-trained CNN achieving the highest accuracy (91.4%), followed closely by ResNet (89.6%) and Random Forest (88.2%). Among traditional classifiers, SVM and Decision Trees performed competitively with 85.6% and 85.4% accuracy, respectively, while k-NN and Naïve Bayes achieved lower results. Furthermore, ensemble methods demonstrated superior performance, with XGBoost achieving the highest accuracy (96.8%), outperforming Random Forest (95.5%) and boosting techniques like AdaBoost (92.4%). The study concludes that CNNs and ensemble methods provide the best results for complex image classification tasks, whereas traditional algorithms remain viable for smaller datasets with computational constraints. These findings serve as a guide for selecting optimal machine learning techniques for various image classification applications.

 

References

Al-Saffar, A. A. M., Tao, H., & Talab, M. A. (2017, October). Review of deep convolution neural network in image classification. In 2017 International conference on radar, antenna, microwave, electronics, and telecommunications (ICRAMET) (pp. 26-31). IEEE.

Chong, J. W. R., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Ting, H. Y., Iwamoto, K., Ruan, R., ... & Show, P. L. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven microalgae autotrophic batch cultivation: A comparative study of machine and deep learning-based image classification models. Algal Research, 79, 103400.

Dalavai, L., Purimetla, N. M., Vellela, S. S., SyamsundaraRao, T., Vuyyuru, L. R., & Kumar, K. K. (2024, December). Improving Deep Learning-Based Image Classification Through Noise Reduction and Feature Enhancement. In 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computation-Based Sensor Application (ICAIQSA) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

Dey, S., Gupta, A., & Kumar, S. (2020). Hybrid models for image classification: A survey. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 11(5), 879-902.

Gao, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, P., & Yang, J. (2019). Transfer learning for medical image classification: A review. Neurocomputing, 335, 251-261.

Gupta, R., Sharma, N., & Verma, K. (2021). A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for image classification. Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 11(5), 23-29

Johnson, A., & Patel, P. (2019). Comparing performance of machine learning algorithms for image classification. International Journal of Image Processing and Vision Science, 9(4), 45-52.

Liu, C., Dong, Y., Xiang, W., Yang, X., Su, H., Zhu, J., ... & Zheng, S. (2025). A comprehensive study on robustness of image classification models: Benchmarking and rethinking. International Journal of Computer Vision, 133(2), 567-589.

Liu, X., Sun, L., & Zhou, H. (2020). Comparative analysis of lightweight models for image classification. IEEE Access, 8, 123456-123467. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999987

Luan, H., Yang, K., Hu, T., Hu, J., Liu, S., Li, R., ... & Niu, B. (2025). Review of deep learning-based pathological image classification: From task-specific models to foundation models. Future Generation Computer Systems, 164, 107578.

Mahesh, B. (2020). Machine learning algorithms-a review. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).[Internet], 9(1), 381-386.

Mhawes Al-Naseri, Z. F. (2022). Algorithms To Solve The Classification Problem And Objects Recognition In Images Using Mat Lab. Webology (ISSN: 1735-188X), 19(4).

Patel, A., Gupta, D., & Singh, P. (2020). Machine learning approaches for image classification: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Computer Science Trends and Technology, 8(1), 55-64.

Plaksyvyi, A., Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., & Powroźnik, P. (2023). A comparative analysis of image segmentation using classical and deep learning approach. Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal, 17(6).

Ramesh, S., Kumar, A., & Prasad, B. (2020). A review on machine learning algorithms for image classification. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 11(2), 98-108.

Sarker, M., & Rahman, F. (2023). Performance evaluation of deep learning models for image classification. International Journal of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10(3), 112-121.

Senokosov, A., Sedykh, A., Sagingalieva, A., Kyriacou, B., & Melnikov, A. (2024). Quantum machine learning for image classification. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 5(1), 015040.

Shankar, D., Yadav, R., & Tiwari, A. (2022). Application of machine learning in medical image classification: A comparative study. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 15(2), 87-95.

Sheth, V., Tripathi, U., & Sharma, A. (2022). A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for classification purpose. Procedia Computer Science, 215, 422-431.

Singh, V., & Choudhary, A. (2020). Comparative analysis of traditional and deep learning models for image classification. International Journal of Machine Learning and Networked Systems, 8(3), 71-84.

Wang, W., Li, Y., Yan, X., Xiao, M., & Gao, M. (2024, September). Breast cancer image classification method based on deep transfer learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition (pp. 190-197).

Wang, Y., Zhang, J., & Liu, D. (2021). Comparison of modern deep learning models for large-scale image classification. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 20(4), 234-245.

Wu, W. (2025, March). Optimizing Image Classification Models for Cloud Infrastructure with Elastic Scaling. In 2025 4th International Symposium on Computer Applications and Information Technology (ISCAIT) (pp. 2203-2207). IEEE.

Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2019). Performance evaluation of decision tree and CNN in image classification tasks. Machine Learning and Data Mining, 9(2), 128-138.

Published

2025-07-28